Comparison of four methodologies for rapid and cost-effective identification of Candida glabrata

28Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To improve turnaround time and decrease the cost of the identification of Candida glabrata, we evaluated four methods for the detection of trehalose assimilation or fermentation. These methods were compared with the API 20C method (bioMERIEUX, Hazelwood, Mo.) to determine accuracy. We recommend the use of Remel Rapid Trehalose Assimilation Broth because of its rapid, 3-h results, reasonable sensitivity, and low number of false positives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fenn, J. A. P., Billetdeaux, E., Segal, H., Skodack-Jones, L., Padilla, P. E., Bale, M., & Carroll, K. (1999). Comparison of four methodologies for rapid and cost-effective identification of Candida glabrata. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 37(10), 3387–3389. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.10.3387-3389.1999

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free