Oesophageal diameter is associated with severity but not progression of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

22Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and objective: It is unknown whether oesophageal disease is associated with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) severity, progression or mortality. Methods: High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans from 145 SSc-ILD patients were scored for fibrosis score, oesophageal diameter and presence of hiatal hernia. Fibrosis asymmetry was calculated as: (most affected side − least affected side)/(most affected side + least affected side). Mixed effects models were used for repeated measures analyses. Results: Mean fibrosis score was 8.6%, and most patients had mild-to-moderate physiological impairment. Every 1 cm increase in oesophageal diameter was associated with 1.8% higher fibrosis score and 5.5% lower forced vital capacity (FVC; P ≤ 0.001 for unadjusted and adjusted analyses). Patients with hiatal hernia had 3.9% higher fibrosis score, with persistent differences on adjusted analysis (P = 0.001). Oesophageal diameter predicted worsening fibrosis score over the subsequent year (P = 0.02), but not when adjusting for baseline fibrosis score (P = 0.16). Oesophageal diameter was independently associated with mortality (P = 0.001). Oesophageal diameter was not associated with asymmetric disease or radiological features of gross aspiration. Conclusion: Oesophageal diameter and hiatal hernia are independently associated with SSc-ILD severity and mortality, but not with ILD progression or asymmetric disease. Oesophageal disease is unlikely to be a significant driver of ILD progression in SSc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Winstone, T. A., Hague, C. J., Soon, J., Sulaiman, N., Murphy, D., Leipsic, J., … Ryerson, C. J. (2018). Oesophageal diameter is associated with severity but not progression of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Respirology, 23(10), 921–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13309

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free