Efficacy and safety of tension band wiring versus plate fixation in olecranon fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

50Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Olecranon fracture (OF) is a common upper limb fracture, and the most commonly used techniques are still tension band wiring (TBW) and plate fixation (PF). The aim of the current study is to discuss whether TBW or PF technique of internal fixation is better in the treatment of OFs, using the method of meta-analysis. Methods: The eligible studies were acquired from PubMed, CNKI, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other sources. The data were extracted by two of the coauthors independently and were analyzed by RevMan5.3. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. Results: Thirteen studies including 1 RCT and 12 observational studies were assessed. Our meta-analysis results showed that both in RCT and observational studies, there were no significant differences between the two groups in disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) (SMD = 0.07, 95% CI = -0.32 to 0.46, p = 0.73), improvement rate (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.48-1.22, p = 0.26), range of motion (ROM), operation time (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI = -1.17 to 0.14, p = 0.12) and blood loss (SMD = -0.97, 95% CI = -2.06 to 0.11, p = 0.08). The overall estimate of complications indicated that the pooled OR was 2.61 (95% CI = 1.65-4.14, p < 0.0001), suggesting that the difference was statistically significant. We also compared the outcomes of patients with mayo type IIA OFs treated by TBW and PF in DASH and ROM and found no differences. Conclusions: Both TBW and PF interventions had treatment benefit in OFs. The current study reveals that there are no significant differences in DASH, improvement rate, ROM, operation time, and blood loss between TBW and PF for OFs. Due to the less complications, we recommend the PF approach as the optical choice for OFs. More high-quality studies are required to further confirm our results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ren, Y. M., Qiao, H. Y., Wei, Z. J., Lin, W., Fan, B. Y., Liu, J., … Feng, S. Q. (2016). Efficacy and safety of tension band wiring versus plate fixation in olecranon fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0465-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free