A line-based spectral clustering method for efficient planar structure extraction from LiDAR data

10Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Planar structures are essential components of the urban landscape and automated extraction planar structure from LiDAR data is a fundamental step in solving complex mapping tasks such as building recognition and urban modelling. This paper presents a new and effective method for planar structure extraction from airborne LiDAR data based on spectral clustering of straight line segments. The straight line segments are derived from LiDAR scan lines using an Iterative-End-Point-Fit simplification algorithm. Adjacency matrix is then formed based on pair-wise similarity of the extracted line segments, and a symmetric affine matrix is derived which is then decomposed into eigenspace. The planar structures are then detected by mean-shift clustering algorithm in eigenspace. The use of straight line segments facilitates the processing and significantly reduces the computational load. Spectral analysis of straight line segments in eigenspace makes the planar structures more prominent, resulting in a robust extraction of planar surfaces. Experiments are performed on the ISPRS benchmark LiDAR data over three test sites containing a variety of buildings with complex roof structures and varying sizes. The experimental results, which are quantitatively evaluated independently by the ISPRS benchmark test group, are presented. The results show that the proposed method achieves on average 80% of completeness with over 98% of correctness. Better performance is observed over larger size of buildings (>10m2) with over 92% of completeness and nearly 100% of correctness in all test areas, indicating the robustness and high reliability of the proposed algorithm.

Figures

  • Figure 2: Flow chart of spectral clustering.
  • Figure 1: Straight line segment extraction. (a) Point cloud from a portion of a scan line; (b) initial straight line segments and coarse ground level; (c) Straight line segments on roofs.
  • Figure 3: Illustration of spectral clustering. (a) Raw point cloud; (b) extracted line segments; (c) constructed adjacency matrix; (d) ideal adjacency matrix; (e) line-based clustering result.
  • Figure 4: Boundary dection results. (a) and (b) Detected boundaries of extracted planes and final structure representation; (c) and (d) simplified boundaries and planar structure.
  • Figure 5. Experiments on testing areas. The first column shows true orthoimages. The second column is the extracted plane structures on the true orthoimage. The third column illustrates the clustering result of line segments of a local area and the last column presents the extracted planar structures.
  • Table 2 Statistical evaluation of the plane extraction results
  • Table 1 Parameters setting for experiment

References Powered by Scopus

Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis

10267Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A tutorial on spectral clustering

7905Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficient RANSAC for point-cloud shape detection

1922Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An automated method to register airborne and terrestrial laser scanning point clouds

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semantic decomposition and reconstruction of compound buildings with symmetric roofs from LiDAR data and aerial imagery

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Planar Segmentation Using Range Images from Terrestrial Laser Scanning

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, Y., Zhang, C., & Fraser, C. S. (2013). A line-based spectral clustering method for efficient planar structure extraction from LiDAR data. In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 103–108). Copernicus GmbH. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W2-103-2013

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

67%

Researcher 5

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 9

56%

Computer Science 3

19%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

19%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0