The dual challenges of generality and specificity when developing environmental DNA markers for species and subspecies of Oncorhynchus

82Citations
Citations of this article
154Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is a powerful tool for detecting invasive and native aquatic species. Often, species of conservation interest co-occur with other, closely related taxa. Here, we developed qPCR (quantitative PCR) markers which distinguish westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewsi), Yellowstone cutthroat trout (O. clarkii bouvieri), and rainbow trout (O. mykiss), which are of conservation interest both as native species and as invasive species across each other's native ranges. We found that local polymorphisms within westslope cutthroat trout and rainbow trout posed a challenge to designing assays that are generally applicable across the range of these widely-distributed species. Further, poorly-resolved taxonomies of Yellowstone cutthroat trout and Bonneville cutthroat trout (O. c. Utah) prevented design of an assay that distinguishes these recognized taxa. The issues of intraspecific polymorphism and unresolved taxonomy for eDNA assay design addressed in this study are likely to be general problems for closely-related taxa. Prior to field application, we recommend that future studies sample populations and test assays more broadly than has been typical of published eDNA assays to date.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Environmental DNAmarker development may be difficult or impossible when the target taxon’s taxonomy is unresolved or has poor concordance with true phylogeny. Colored boxes show recognized taxa and black lines show the phylogenetic relationships among populations. (A) Taxon X includes multiple, divergent lineages. It is important that all of these lineages are sampled during marker validation to insure intraspecific generality. Even extensive sampling of a single lineage (red circle) is not sufficient and will lead to ascertainment bias and low marker generality. (B) Recognized taxa X and Y are not monophyletic (i.e., they are both paraphyletic groups), which may make distinguishing between them using sequence data impossible. (C) Recognized taxon X includes divergent lineages (polyphyly), but some of those lineages may also not be distinguishable from recognized taxon Y.
  • Table 1. Source populations for fish used in assay design and testing.
  • Table 1. (Continued)
  • Table 1. (Continued)
  • Fig 2. Source locations for rainbow trout (green triangles), westslope cutthroat trout (red circles), and Yellowstone/Bonneville cutthroat trout (both subspecies indicated with blue squares) sampled from the wild for assay development (large, light-colored shapes) and for assay testing (small, darkcolored shapes). The source locations for one rainbow trout sample obtained from Alaska (USA), all hatchery-derived fish, and the Pacific salmon congeners used in assay testing are not shown here, but are listed in Table 1.
  • Table 2. Sequences for each of the validated taxon-specific qPCR assays.
  • Table 3. Summary of results of the validated taxon-specific qPCR assays.

References Powered by Scopus

MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods

36497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments

12454Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one

3595Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays

377Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring

147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving eDNA yield and inhibitor reduction through increased water volumes and multi-filter isolation techniques

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilcox, T. M., Carim, K. J., McKelvey, K. S., Young, M. K., & Schwartz, M. K. (2015). The dual challenges of generality and specificity when developing environmental DNA markers for species and subspecies of Oncorhynchus. PLoS ONE, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142008

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 59

64%

Researcher 27

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56

55%

Environmental Science 21

21%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 21

21%

Computer Science 4

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0