Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review

54Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to integrate and assess evidence for the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation (i.e., stimulating at least two of the following sensory systems: visual, auditory, and somatosensory) as a possible rehabilitation method after stroke. Evidence was considered with a focus on low-level, perceptual (visual, auditory and somatosensory deficits), as well as higher-level, cognitive, sensory deficits. We referred to the electronic databases Scopus and PubMed to search for articles that were published before May 2015. Studies were included which evaluated the effects of multisensory stimulation on patients with low- or higher-level sensory deficits caused by stroke. Twenty-one studies were included in this review and the quality of these studies was assessed (based on eight elements: randomization, inclusion of control patient group, blinding of participants, blinding of researchers, follow-up, group size, reporting effect sizes, and reporting time post-stroke). Twenty of the twenty-one included studies demonstrate beneficial effects on low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Notwithstanding these beneficial effects, the quality of the studies is insufficient for valid conclusion that multisensory stimulation can be successfully applied as an effective intervention. A valuable and necessary next step would be to set up well-designed randomized controlled trials to examine the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation as an intervention for low- and/or higher-level sensory deficits after stroke. Finally, we consider the potential mechanisms of multisensory stimulation for rehabilitation to guide this future research.

References Powered by Scopus

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

25720Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct

1597Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial attention and neglect: Parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events

938Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Are we ready for real-world neuroscience?

133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of virtual reality training on function in chronic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of Virtual Reality on Postural and Balance Control in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Literature Review

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tinga, A. M., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., van der Smagt, M. J., Van der Stigchel, S., van Ee, R., & Nijboer, T. C. W. (2016, March 1). Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neuropsychology Review. Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-015-9301-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 74

80%

Researcher 9

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 24

28%

Psychology 23

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 22

26%

Medicine and Dentistry 16

19%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 28

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free