Albumin versus other fluids for fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis

52Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background:Early fluid resuscitation is vital to patients with sepsis. However, the choice of fluid has been a hot topic of discussion. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of albumin-containing fluids for resuscitation in patients with sepsis was associated with a decreased mortality rate. Methods:We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to March 2014. The selection of eligible studies, assessment of methodological quality, and extraction of all relevant data were conducted by two authors independently. Results:In total, 15 RCTs were eligible for analysis. After pooling the data, we found there was no significant effect of albumin-containing fluids on mortality in patients with sepsis of any severity (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.02 and RD:-0.01, 95% CI:-0.03, 0.01). The results were robust to subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and trial sequential analyses. Conclusion:The present meta-analysis did not demonstrate significant advantage of using albumin-containing fluids for resuscitation in patients with sepsis of any severity. Given the cost-effectiveness of using albumin, crystalloids should be the first choice for fluid resuscitation in septic patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, L., Jiang, S., Zhang, M., Zheng, Z., & Ma, Y. (2014). Albumin versus other fluids for fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114666

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free