Association between extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (Ecmo) and mortality in the patients with cardiac arrest: A nation-wide population-based study with propensity score matched analysis

14Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We attempted to determine the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on short-term and long-term outcomes and find potential resource utilization differences between the ECMO and non-ECMO groups, using the National Health Insurance Service database. We selected adult patients (≥20 years old) with non-traumatic cardiac arrest from 2007 to 2015. Data on age, sex, insurance status, hospital volume, residential area urbanization, and pre-existing diseases were extracted from the database. A total of 1.5% (n = 3859) of 253,806 patients were categorized into the ECMO group. The ECMO-supported patients were more likely to be younger, men, more covered by national health insurance, and showed, higher usage of tertiary level and large volume hospitals, and a lower rate of pre-existing comorbidities, compared to the non-ECMO group. After propensity score-matching demographic data, hospital factors, and pre-existing diseases, the odds ratio (ORs) of the ECMO group were 0.76 (confidence interval, (CI) 0.68–0.85) for 30-day mortality and 0.66 (CI 0.58–0.79) for 1-year mortality using logistic regression. The index hospitalization was longer, and the 30-day and 1-year hospital costs were greater in the matched ECMO group. Although ECMO support needed longer hospitalization days and higher hospital costs, the ECMO support reduced the risk of 30-day and 1-year mortality compared to the non-ECMO patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S. J., Han, K. S., Lee, E. J., Lee, S. J., Lee, J. S., & Lee, S. W. (2020). Association between extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (Ecmo) and mortality in the patients with cardiac arrest: A nation-wide population-based study with propensity score matched analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113703

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free