Developing dimensions for a multicomponent multidisciplinary approach to obesity management: A qualitative study

22Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There have been consistent recommendations for multicomponent and multidisciplinary approaches for obesity management. However, there is no clear agreement on the components, disciplines or processes to be considered within such an approach. In this study, we explored multicomponent and multidisciplinary approaches through an examination of knowledge, skills, beliefs, and recommendations of stakeholders involved in obesity management. These stakeholders included researchers, practitioners, educators, and patients. Methods: We used qualitative action research methods, including convergent interviewing and observation, to assist the process of inquiry. Results: The consensus was that a multicomponent and multidisciplinary approach should be based on four central meta-components (patient, practitioner, process, and environmental factors), and specific components of these factors were identified. Psychologists, dieticians, exercise physiologists and general practitioners were nominated as key practitioners to be included. Conclusions: A complex condition like obesity requires that multiple components be addressed, and that both patients and multiple disciplines are involved in developing solutions. Implementing cycles of continuous improvement to deal with complexity, instead of trying to control for it, offers an effective way to deal with complex, changing multisystem problems like obesity.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cochrane, A. J., Dick, B., King, N. A., Hills, A. P., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2017). Developing dimensions for a multicomponent multidisciplinary approach to obesity management: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4834-2

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

10%

Researcher 4

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 22

48%

Medicine and Dentistry 13

28%

Psychology 8

17%

Social Sciences 3

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0