Comparative study of disabled vs. non-disabled evaluators in user-testing: Dyslexia and first year students learning computer programming

16Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

User-testing is a critical activity in software development. However, eliciting appropriate test-users can be difficult. Recent work showed that (during user-testing of educational software) dyslexic final-year students identified a larger number of subtle (yet significant) issues in more detail than other students. However, final year students were not the target users of the software (designed to teach fundamental programming concepts). This paper presents preliminary results of work replicating the previous study, but with participants from the target user group (first year students). The first year students identified fewer issues and gave less detail than the final year students. The dyslexic students identified more issues in greater detail than the other students. This highlights a distinction between the perceived target user group (first year students) and the actual target user group (students who don't understand programming concepts). Dyslexia may push people deeper into the actual target user group for educational software. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dixon, M. (2007). Comparative study of disabled vs. non-disabled evaluators in user-testing: Dyslexia and first year students learning computer programming. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4554 LNCS, pp. 647–656). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_72

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free