A tutorial on evaluating expected returns from research for fishery management using bayes' theorem

19Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Traditional methods for evaluating potential or actual returns from research and development include scoring methods, cost-benefit analysis and production-function approaches. The research reported in the present paper complements these traditional methods with the use of statistical decision analysis and Bayesian methods to account explicitly for risk and uncertainty and to capture some of the effects of information evolution. Measurement of the expected returns from research for fishery management is detailed. Both ex post and ex ante evaluation of expected returns are illustrated by deliberately simplified example. © 1997 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

A nonparametric analysis of the influence of research on agricultural productivity

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTION FRONTIER METHODOLOGIES AND DAIRY FARM EFFICIENCY

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The contribution of agricultural research to production

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures

307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

When do we need more data? A primer on calculating the value of information for applied ecologists

158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Harvest strategy evaluation for the eastern stock of gemfish (Rexea solandri)

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McDonald, A. D., & Smith, A. D. M. (1997). A tutorial on evaluating expected returns from research for fishery management using bayes’ theorem. Natural Resource Modeling, 10(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.1997.tb00106.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

50%

Environmental Science 2

33%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free