Multidisciplinary models aggregating ‘lower-level’ biological and ‘higher-level’ psychological and social determinants of a phenomenon raise a puzzle. How is the interaction between the physical, the psychological and the social conceptualized and explained? Using biopsychosocial models of pain as an illustration, I argue that these models are in fact level-neutral compilations of empirical findings about correlated and causally relevant factors, and as such they neither assume, nor entail a conceptual or ontological stratification into levels of description, explanation or reality. If inter-level causation is deemed problematic or if debates about the superiority of a particular level of description or explanation arise, these issues are fueled by considerations other than empirical findings.
CITATION STYLE
Baetu, T. M. (2019). On pain experience, multidisciplinary integration and the level-laden conception of science. Synthese, 196(8), 3231–3250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1429-5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.