Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et.al

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An evaluation of Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) was recently conducted by San Sebastian et al. (BMC Public Health 19:202, 2019). Evaluation of health care interventions of this kind require 1) an understanding of both the design and the nature of the intervention, 2) correct definition of the target population, and 3) careful choice of the appropriate evaluation method. In this correspondence, we review the approach used by San Sebastian et al. as relates to these three criteria. Within this framework, we suggest important explanations for why the conclusions drawn by these authors contradict a large body of research on the effectiveness of the VIP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blomstedt, Y., Norberg, M., Ng, N., Nyström, L., Boman, K., Lönnberg, G., … Weinehall, L. (2019). Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et.al. BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7444-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free