Is pulse pressure variation more accurate than central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) for volume resuscitation?

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A 48-year-old man on postoperative day 2 is recovering in the surgical intensive care unit from an extensive retroperitoneal sarcoma resection. The case was complicated by transfusion of 12 U of packed red blood cells, 6 U of fresh frozen plasma, and two packs of platelets. Due to the nature of his operation and the likely stormy postoperative course, it is decided to keep the patient sedated, intubated, and mechanically ventilated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scher, C. S. (2016). Is pulse pressure variation more accurate than central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) for volume resuscitation? In You’re Wrong, I’m Right: Dueling Authors Reexamine Classic Teachings in Anesthesia (pp. 389–391). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43169-7_111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free