Public debt and economic growth: what do neoclassical growth models teach us?

21Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper aims to quantify the crowding-out effect of public debt and the related loss in long-run output in neoclassical growth models. To accomplish this task, we incorporate the government sector into the Ramsey–Cass–Koopmans (RCK) model, the Blanchard model and the Solow model, which differ only in their assumptions concerning the consumption behaviour of households. We also introduce a general framework that is capable of gauging the burden of public debt in a neoclassical world in the case of any type of consumption behaviour. Our results are threefold. First, contrary to the RCK model, public debt reduces long-run output in the Blanchard model and the Solow model, although to a different extent: the crowding-out effect is marginal in the former, whereas it can be very large in the latter. Second, the burden of public debt is country-specific depending crucially on the saving rate and the population growth rate. Finally, in developed countries the upper limit of the output loss related to public debt is moderate at best even if distortionary taxes are taken into account.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dombi, Á., & Dedák, I. (2019). Public debt and economic growth: what do neoclassical growth models teach us? Applied Economics, 51(29), 3104–3121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1508869

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free