The concepts of place and territory in the composition of Cultural Heritage: Quilombos and indigenous lands in the Brazilian Federal Constitution

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The current Brazilian Constitution deals with indigenous and quilombo rights, both in relation to land and culture. But incoherently, it unties the two issues that are inherent in each other. In view of political and economic interests, the National Constituent Assembly, which forged the Constitution, was the scene of the imponderable detachment of the binomial place and territory of cultural practices and goods classified as heritage. In order to understand this question, a bibliographical review was raised with the intention of demonstrating how this separation present in the legal text can only be justified by the optics of the political game.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quilombos, federal heritage policy and reparations

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salomão de Campos, Y. D. (2018). The concepts of place and territory in the composition of Cultural Heritage: Quilombos and indigenous lands in the Brazilian Federal Constitution. Tempo e Argumento, 10(25), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.5965/2175180310252018099

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

33%

Social Sciences 2

33%

Arts and Humanities 1

17%

Environmental Science 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free