Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial

23Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization does not recommend dilatation and sharp curettage (D&C) for the surgical treatment of miscarriage during the first trimester because this may cause Asherman’s syndrome due to endometrial damage; therefore, suction remains the primary treatment option. While manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) has been widely used since the 1990s outside Japan, the use of an MVA device (Women’s MVA system) was approved in Japan in October 2015. Here, we examined the efficacy of the MVA kit in women surgically treated for miscarriage. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at the International University of Health and Welfare Hospital in Japan. Women who underwent surgical treatment for miscarriage within 12 weeks of pregnancy were identified and enrolled in the study. A total of 404 women were included who underwent the following procedures: 121 D&C, 123 electric vacuum aspiration (EVA), and 160 MVA. For each participant, the duration of surgery, amount of bleeding, amount of anesthetic used, incomplete abortion requiring repeat procedures, and intraoperative/postoperative complications were evaluated. Results: The duration of surgery was 13.7 ± 7.2, 11.2 ± 4.2, and 6.9 ± 4.3 min in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 1.00). The amount of anesthetic used was not significantly different among all groups. Bleeding of ≥ 100 mL was confirmed in three (2.4%), one (0.8%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.50). Incomplete abortion was identified in three (2.4%), two (1.6%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.61). However, severe intraoperative/postoperative complications were not observed in any group. Conclusions: Surgical treatment for miscarriage performed using the MVA kit has safety and efficacy similar to those of conventional methods, such as D&C and EVA.

References Powered by Scopus

Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification

217Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for early first-trimester abortion: A controlled study of complication rates

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion: A systematic review

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Survey on spontaneous miscarriage and induced abortion surgery safety at less than 12 weeks of gestation in Japan

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Uterine Perforation as a Complication of the Intrauterine Procedures Causing Omentum Incarceration: A Review

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kakinuma, T., Kakinuma, K., Sakamoto, Y., Kawarai, Y., Saito, K., Ihara, M., … Tanaka, H. (2020). Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03362-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

65%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Researcher 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 32

71%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

18%

Social Sciences 3

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free