Prognostic value of static and dynamic biomarkers in COVID-19 patients: a prospective cohort study

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze in a prospective cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients the relationship between biomarkers levels and their variation within the first 4 days since admission, and prognosis. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Individuals with confirmed diagnosis of covid-19 admitted in our hospital were included. Blood samples were obtained systematically on days 1 and 4 of hospitalization. Levels of RCP, LDH, Ferritin and D-dimer, together with platelets, lymphocytes and neutrophils counts were measured. A combined outcome that included ICU admission and death was considered the primary outcome. Logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: We included 335 patients with confirmed COVID-19. During their hospitalization, 23 (6.8%) needed ICU admission, and 10 (2.9%) died. In the multivariate analysis, a value of RCP greater than 10 mg/dl (OR 8.69, CI95% 1.45-52), an increase in RCP greater than 20% (OR 26.08, CI 95% 3.21-211.3), an increase in LDH greater than 20% (OR 6.29, CI 95% 1.84-21.44), a count of lymphocytes lower than 1500/mm3 (OR 2.74, CI 95% 1.04-7.23), a D-dimer value greater than 550 ng/ml (OR 9.8, CI 95% 1.78-53.9) and a neutrophil/lymphocyte index greater than 3(OR 4.5, CI 95% 1.43-14.19) were all associated with the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the utilization of static and dynamic biomarkers may represent an important tool to assess prognosis of COVID-19 patients.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hormanstorfer, M., Borodowski, H., Nelson, K., Patrosso, M. J., Kolland, I., Italiano, L., … Paulin, F. (2021). Prognostic value of static and dynamic biomarkers in COVID-19 patients: a prospective cohort study. Revista Espanola de Quimioterapia : Publicacion Oficial de La Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 34(4), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.37201/req/141.2020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free