A focus group study to understand the perspectives of physiotherapists on barriers and facilitators to advancing rehabilitation in low-resource and conflict settings

10Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Physiotherapy as a health profession is continuously evolving in high-income countries (HIC). The highest burden of disease globally, however, is in low-resource and conflict contexts (LR-CC), resulting in unmet rehabilitation needs. Rehabilitation service models from HIC often face challenges when applied to the fragile health systems of LR-CC. It is important to engage rehabilitation experts living and working in LR-CC to guide service development. This study aims to understand physiotherapists’ views and perspectives of current rehabilitation services, of how these services can be strengthened over the next 10 years and of the role of physiotherapy within this development. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 31 physiotherapists from 18 LR-CC using English as a common language. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was guided by thematic analysis. Participants provided deep insights into the complexity of developing rehabilitation services within fragile health systems. Participants agreed that physiotherapy lacked recognition and resources to be utilised effectively. Interacting themes as crucial prerequisites for strengthening the sector included (1) significance of context, (2) professional identity, and (3) professionalisation supported by workforce development and advocacy. These results are an important evidence base for informing the development of rehabilitation programmes in LR-CC and for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barth, C. A., Donovan-Hall, M., Blake, C., Akhtar, N. J., Capo-Chichi, J. M., & O’sullivan, C. (2021). A focus group study to understand the perspectives of physiotherapists on barriers and facilitators to advancing rehabilitation in low-resource and conflict settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free