Predicting research trends identified by research histories via breakthrough researches

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since it is difficult to understand or predict research trends, we proposed methodologies for understanding and predicting research trends in the sciences, focusing on the structures of grants in the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), a Japanese funding agency. Grant applications are suitable for predicting research trends because these are research plans for the future, different from papers, which report research outcomes in the past. We investigated research trends in science focusing on research histories identified in grant application data of JSPS. Then we proposed a model for predicting research trends, assuming that breakthrough research encourages researchers to change from their current research field to an entirely new research field. Using breakthrough research, we aim to obtain higher precision in the prediction results. In our experimental results, we found that research fields in Informatics correlate well with actual scientific research trends. We also demonstrated that our prediction models are effective in actively interacting research areas, which include Informatics and Social Sciences.

References Powered by Scopus

Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration

1463Citations
1157Readers
Get full text
229Citations
234Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2Citations
18Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamashita, N., Numao, M., & Ichise, R. (2015). Predicting research trends identified by research histories via breakthrough researches. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E98D(2), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2013EDP7435

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘20‘21‘22‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

57%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Decision Sciences 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0