Grazing effects on the nutritive value of dominant species in steppe grasslands of northern China

11Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Forage nutritive value plays an important role in livestock nutrition and maintaining sustainable grassland ecosystems, and grazing management can affect the quality of forage. In this study, we investigated the effects of different grazing intensities on the nutritive values of Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvelev, Artemisia spp. and Carex duriuscula C. A. Mey in the steppes of China during the growing seasons from 2011 to 2013. Five grazing management treatments were implemented: (1) rest grazing in spring, heavy grazing in summer and moderate grazing in autumn (RHM), (2) rest grazing in spring, moderate grazing in summer and heavy grazing in autumn (RMH), (3) heavy grazing though all seasons (HHH), (4) heavy grazing in spring and summer and moderate grazing in autumn (HHM) and (5) continuous moderate grazing in all seasons (MMM). Results: There were significant effects of year, season, treatment, and year × season and year × treatment interactions only on the crude protein of L. chinensis (P < 0.05). The crude protein concentrations of L. chinensis in the plots of constant high grazing pressure (HHH) and reduced grazing pressure in the last grazing stage (HHM) were higher than with deferred grazing (RMH and RHM, P < 0.05) in spring from 2011 to 2012. For Artemisia spp. and C. duriuscula, the crude protein concentration in HHH was higher than that in RMH (P < 0.05) in the summer of 2011. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) for ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and Ca concentration for any of the grasses in spring and summer from 2011 to 2013 under the different grazing management treatments. Conclusions: The nutritive value of L. chinensis was more responsive to grazing disturbance than Artemisia spp. and C. duriuscula, and heavy grazing maintained a relatively high crude protein content in all species. Seasonal and interannual seasonal differences in grazing management combinations were two of the most important factors in determining the variability of forage nutritive value, including crude protein, ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and calcium, for L. chinensis, Artemisia spp. and C. duriuscula. We suggest that moderate grazing should be adopted to ensure the quality and yield of forage and promote the sustainable development of animal husbandry.

References Powered by Scopus

Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition

24178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rotational grazing on rangelands: Reconciliation of perception and experimental evidence

537Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A landscape-scale assessment of steppe degradation in the Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia, China

272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Temporal variations of herbage production and nutritive value of three grasslands at different elevation zones regarding grazing needs and welfare of ruminants

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of forage quantity and quality in the semi-arid Borana Lowlands, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of soil physicochemical properties on the steppe grazing potential in eastern Eurasian steppe

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhai, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, K., Chen, Q., Li, S., & Huang, D. (2018). Grazing effects on the nutritive value of dominant species in steppe grasslands of northern China. BMC Ecology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0186-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

83%

Researcher 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

55%

Environmental Science 3

27%

Chemical Engineering 1

9%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free