Deliberative Decisions and Formal Multicriteria Analysis: Addressing Norton’s Skepticism

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Norton has argued for the salience of deliberative strategies for making environmental decisions which is supposed to be preferable to formal decision analysis. This paper argues that formal multicriteria decision analysis, when deployed with care, has the flexibility to absorb the advantages of deliberative decision making. It can also be used for decision support during a deliberative process. This feature of decision analysis is illustrated using a case study from Merauke in Papua province of Indonesian New Guinea.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarkar, S. (2018). Deliberative Decisions and Formal Multicriteria Analysis: Addressing Norton’s Skepticism. In International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics (Vol. 26, pp. 213–236). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92597-4_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free