Doctoral Preparation of Scientifically Based Education Researchers

91Citations
Citations of this article
202Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Finding improved ways to train education researchers has taken on new urgency as federal legislation such as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 call for “scientifically based research in education.” The authors of this article suggest an approach to socializing doctoral students to a common “culture of science” (a set of norms for scientific inquiry) and preparing them for interdisciplinary studies that span the natural and social sciences. Drawing on developments in the fields of neuroscience, sociology of natural science, and the learning sciences, the authors argue for an approach to doctoral training that is consistent with a broad definition of scientifically based research. © 2005, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

A Knowledge Base for the Teaching Profession: What Would It Look Like and How Can We Get One?

658Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive control signals for neural prosthetics

608Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions

561Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Critical Qualitative Inquiry

382Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion

371Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs

261Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eisenhart, M., & Dehaan, R. L. (2005). Doctoral Preparation of Scientifically Based Education Researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004003

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 112

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 26

16%

Researcher 16

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 115

82%

Psychology 10

7%

Arts and Humanities 9

6%

Linguistics 6

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free