Entanglement, holonomic constraints, and the quantization of fundamental interactions

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We provide a proof for the necessity of quantizing fundamental interactions demonstrating that a quantum version is needed for any non trivial conservative interaction whose strength depends on the relative distance between two objects. Our proof is based on a consistency argument that in the presence of a classical field two interacting objects in a separable state could not develop entanglement. This requirement can be cast in the form of a holonomic constraint that cannot be satisfied by generic interparticle potentials. Extending this picture of local holonomic constraints, we design a protocol that allows to measure the terms of a multipole expansion of the interaction of two composite bodies. The results presented in this work can pave the way for a study of fundamental interactions based on the analysis of entanglement properties.

References Powered by Scopus

Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits

7412Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Entanglement in many-body systems

2985Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits

2507Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Locality and entanglement in table-top testing of the quantum nature of linearized gravity

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gravitationally mediated entanglement: Newtonian field versus gravitons

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum gravity witness via entanglement of masses: Casimir screening

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giampaolo, S. M., & Macrì, T. (2019). Entanglement, holonomic constraints, and the quantization of fundamental interactions. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47844-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

38%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

38%

Researcher 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 11

79%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

7%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

7%

Computer Science 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free