Need for a comparative performance standard for dry powder inhalers

27Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The efficacy of dry powder inhalers is dependent on the inspiratory flow rate at which they are used. The resistance to airflow through five different dry powder inhaler devices was measured. The devices were shown to vary significantly, with the Turbohaler having the highest resistance. We suggest that the performance of dry powder inhalers should be assessed at comparable pressure drops producing clinically relevant inspiratory flow rates for each device.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richards, R., & Saunders, M. (1993). Need for a comparative performance standard for dry powder inhalers. Thorax, 48(11), 1186–1187. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.48.11.1186

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free