The influence of the type of dominant party on democracy: A comparison between South Africa and Malaysia

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Dominant parties and democracies - are they really strange bedfellows? Malte Kaßner sheds light on the relation between one-party dominance and democracy from a comparative perspective. The study examines the key question how different types of dominant parties influence democracy in multicultural societies with the help of two case studies: South Africa and Malaysia. Both countries are characterized by an ethnically, linguistically and religiously plural society. The author analyses the two dominant parties African National Congress (ANC) and United Malays National Organization (UMNO) and their implications on democracy in the two countries. The outcome suggests that one-party dominance per se cannot be assessed as beneficial or harmful for democratic development. Rather, dominant parties deserve a stronger analytical differentiation. Causal patterns contribute to such a differentiation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaßner, M. (2014). The influence of the type of dominant party on democracy: A comparison between South Africa and Malaysia. The Influence of the Type of Dominant Party on Democracy: A Comparison Between South Africa and Malaysia (pp. 1–384). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04438-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free