Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options

  • Rothwell E
  • Lamb B
  • Johnson E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. Methods Interviews (n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent expanded carrier screening, and were offered pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between July 2016 and July 2017. The interviews were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted on the transcripts. Results Categories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman's contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during in vitro fertilization played a significant role within these results. Conclusion The emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during in vitro fertilization were the primary concerns discussed by participants. Future research is needed to identify ways to help manage unexpected outcomes and continuous uncertainty, including the increasing use of genetic technologies, to not add to the psychological burden of infertility. There is a need to explore more support options or counseling services for patients struggling with infertility during in vitro fertilization treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rothwell, E., Lamb, B., Johnson, E., Gurtcheff, S., Riches, N., Fagan, M., … Johnstone, E. (2020). Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options. Therapeutic Advances in Reproductive Health, 14, 263349411989994. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494119899942

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free