The advocacy coalition framework in Japan: Contributions to policy process studies and the challenges involved

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The advocacy coalition framework (ACF), a unified framework for understanding the policy process, has been applied in various countries and regions; however, there are few contributions from Japan, despite seemingly favorable conditions for applying it. An exploration of what hinders ACF applications in Japan is worthwhile for developing the ACF as a framework for comparative policy process studies across various social and political settings. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review previous Japanese ACF studies. Our review found that Japanese ACF studies are fewer in number, have less coverage of policy fields, and have less methodological diversity and transparency than international trends. While most of the Japanese ACF studies supported the basic hypotheses of the ACF, we found a need to refine some hypotheses and research methods of the ACF studies. We also discuss the background factors in the inactivity of ACF studies in Japan and suggest solutions for it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohno, T., Hirayama, N., Mineo, K., Iwata, K., & Inasawa, I. (2022, January 1). The advocacy coalition framework in Japan: Contributions to policy process studies and the challenges involved. Review of Policy Research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free