Electoral Politics in the Context of Separatism and Political Divergence: An Analysis of 2009 Parliamentary elections in Jammu & Kashmir

Abstract

The paper analyses the 2009 Parliamentary elections in Jammu and Kashmir in the context of the conflict situation that has manifested itself during the last two decades. The separatist sentiment, the paper argues, remains ascendant, even when the mainstream politics (that had become totally irrelevant during the initial years of militancy and political upsurge) has been gradually gaining space. Rather than challenging the separatist politics, the mainstream politics is seeking to legitimise itself by acknowledging its own limitations and confining itself to the politics of ‘governance’ while leaving for the separatist politics the issue of ‘ultimate resolution of conflict’. However, in this process of legitimisation, mainstream politics have taken up many issues from the agenda of separatist politics. Consequently, despite the distinction between the two kinds of politics, there exists an overlap between them. The paper also focuses on the political divergence and the assertion of regional/religious identity politics. The Amarnath agitation which took place a few months before the Parliamentary elections became the basis of massive political mobilisation and reaffirmation of the popular separatist sentiment in Kashmir and religious cum regional identity politics in Jammu. As such, it forms an important reference point for the analysis. The paper also focuses on the 2008 Assembly election which immediately preceded the Parliamentary elections.