Heat and fraud: evaluating how room temperature influences fraud likelihood

0Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite the considerable amount of research devoted to understanding fraud, few studies have examined how the physical environment can influence the likelihood of committing fraud. One recent study found a link between room brightness and occurrence of human fraud behaviors. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate how temperature may affect fraud. Based on a power analysis using the effect size observed in a pilot study, we recruited 105 participants and randomly divided them into three temperature groups (warm, medium, and cool). We then counted fraud behaviors in each group and tested for potential significant differences with a Kruskal–Wallis test. Additionally, we used a correlation analysis to determine whether the perceived temperature affected fraud. As a result, regardless of participants’ subjective sensory experience or their physical environment, we did not find that temperature-related factors influence the incidence of fraud. We discussed the potential reason for the results and suggested directions for future research.

References Powered by Scopus

World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects

0
20449Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How do you feel - now? The anterior insula and human awareness

5047Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body

4564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, H., Yang, J., & Yamada, Y. (2020). Heat and fraud: evaluating how room temperature influences fraud likelihood. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00261-2

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

29%

Researcher 2

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 6

38%

Psychology 4

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0