Physician Bayesian updating from personal beliefs about the base rate and likelihood ratio

12Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Whether humans can accurately make decisions in line with Bayes’ rule has been one of the most important yet contentious topics in cognitive psychology. Though a number of paradigms have been used for studying Bayesian updating, rarely have subjects been allowed to use their own preexisting beliefs about the prior and the likelihood. A study is reported in which physicians judged the posttest probability of a diagnosis for a patient vignette after receiving a test result, and the physicians’ posttest judgments were compared to the normative posttest calculated from their own beliefs in the sensitivity and false positive rate of the test (likelihood ratio) and prior probability of the diagnosis. On the one hand, the posttest judgments were strongly related to the physicians’ beliefs about both the prior probability as well as the likelihood ratio, and the priors were used considerably more strongly than in previous research. On the other hand, both the prior and the likelihoods were still not used quite as much as they should have been, and there was evidence of other nonnormative aspects to the updating, such as updating independent of the likelihood beliefs. By focusing on how physicians use their own prior beliefs for Bayesian updating, this study provides insight into how well experts perform probabilistic inference in settings in which they rely upon their own prior beliefs rather than experimenter-provided cues. It suggests that there is reason to be optimistic about experts’ abilities, but that there is still considerable need for improvement.

References Powered by Scopus

Diagnostic error in internal medicine

1070Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Threshold Approach to Clinical Decision Making

1066Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers

947Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety

147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of Teaching Bayesian Methods Using Learning by Concept vs Learning by Example on Medical Students’ Ability to Estimate Probability of a Diagnosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian analysis. Basic and practical concepts for its interpretation and use

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rottman, B. M. (2017). Physician Bayesian updating from personal beliefs about the base rate and likelihood ratio. Memory and Cognition, 45(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0658-z

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

25%

Researcher 6

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 9

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

17%

Engineering 2

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0