Erratum to: Dog bite injuries to humans and the use of breed-specific legislation: A comparison of bites from legislated and non-legislated dog breeds (Irish Veterinary Journal (2017) 70 (23) DOI: 10.1186/s13620-017-0101-1)

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

After publication of the original article [1] it was brought to our attention that the following errors had occurred: 1. Author Páraic S. Ó Súilleabháin was incorrectly included as Páraic S. Ó Súilleabháin. The correct spelling of the surname is included in the author list of this erratum and updated in the original article. 2. Furthermore, number 1 was omitted from Table 6, question "In your experience, do you believe legislated dog breeds can inflict greater injuries or physical damage compared to non-legislated breeds of similar size?", response "yes". The corrected table is provided here and has been updated in the original article. (Table Presented).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erratum to: Dog bite injuries to humans and the use of breed-specific legislation: A comparison of bites from legislated and non-legislated dog breeds (Irish Veterinary Journal (2017) 70 (23) DOI: 10.1186/s13620-017-0101-1). (2017, August 15). Irish Veterinary Journal. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-017-0104-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free