A geohistorical study of 'the rise of modern science': Mapping scientific practice through urban networks, 1500-1900

44Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using data on the 'career' paths of one thousand 'leading scientists' from 1450 to 1900, what is conventionally called the 'rise of modern science' is mapped as a changing geography of scientific practice in urban networks. Four distinctive networks of scientific practice are identified. A primate network centred on Padua and central and northern Italy in the sixteenth century expands across the Alps to become a polycentric network in the seventeenth century, which in turn dissipates into a weak polycentric network in the eighteenth century. The nineteenth century marks a huge change of scale as a primate network centred on Berlin and dominated by German-speaking universities. These geographies are interpreted as core-producing processes in Wallerstein's modern world-system; the rise of modern scientific practice is central to the development of structures of knowledge that relate to, but do not mirror, material changes in the system. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taylor, P. J., Hoyler, M., & Evans, D. M. (2008). A geohistorical study of “the rise of modern science”: Mapping scientific practice through urban networks, 1500-1900. Minerva, 46(4), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9109-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free