Does the use of paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent decrease further need for coronary-artery bypass grafting when compared with bare-metal stent?

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context and Objective: The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents reduce the need for surgical revascularization. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent are effective in avoiding the need for coronary-artery bypass grafting. Methods: This was a systematic review of the literature using the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. The type of study considered was controlled randomized trials; the type of intervention was drug-eluting or bare-metal stents; and the main outcome investigated was coronary-artery bypass grafting. Results: The ten studies included in this systematic review did not show any statistically significant difference between the drug-eluting stents and the bare-metal stents with regard to the outcome of coronary-artery bypass grafting (confidence interval: 0.31 to 1.42). Conclusion: The surgical revascularization rate was not reduced by the use of drug-eluting stents. Copyright © 2007, Associação Paulista de Medicina.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Lemos, H. P., & Atallah, Á. N. (2007). Does the use of paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent decrease further need for coronary-artery bypass grafting when compared with bare-metal stent? Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Associacao Paulista de Medicina. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802007000400010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free