Context and Objective: The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents reduce the need for surgical revascularization. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent are effective in avoiding the need for coronary-artery bypass grafting. Methods: This was a systematic review of the literature using the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. The type of study considered was controlled randomized trials; the type of intervention was drug-eluting or bare-metal stents; and the main outcome investigated was coronary-artery bypass grafting. Results: The ten studies included in this systematic review did not show any statistically significant difference between the drug-eluting stents and the bare-metal stents with regard to the outcome of coronary-artery bypass grafting (confidence interval: 0.31 to 1.42). Conclusion: The surgical revascularization rate was not reduced by the use of drug-eluting stents. Copyright © 2007, Associação Paulista de Medicina.
CITATION STYLE
de Lemos, H. P., & Atallah, Á. N. (2007). Does the use of paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent decrease further need for coronary-artery bypass grafting when compared with bare-metal stent? Sao Paulo Medical Journal. Associacao Paulista de Medicina. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802007000400010
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.