Life-threatening visceral complications after intragastric balloon insertion: Is the device, the patient or the doctor to blame?

  • Stavrou G
  • Tsaousi G
  • Kotzampassi K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and aim Intragastric balloon placement is established as a safe, relatively low-cost and well-tolerated minimally invasive procedure for weight loss, giving encouraging results under the strict prerequisite that the obese patient will enroll in a medically supervised weight loss program. This retrospective study reviews already published cases of severe visceral complications for the purpose of assigning responsibility to the device, the patient, or the doctor.Methods We reviewed PubMed and Scopus archived publications describing intragastric balloon (BIB/Orbera)-related severe visceral complications, i. e. perforations and obstructions.Results Twenty-two cases of gastric perforation, two cases of esophageal perforation and 10 cases of bowel obstruction were found. For the gastric perforation the endoscopist was responsible in nine cases, the patient in four, and the balloon itself in nine. For the two cases of esophageal perforation, the endoscopists were responsible, while for the 12 cases of bowel obstruction, the patient was responsible for seven and the device for the other five cases.Conclusion BIB/Orbera balloon insertion remains a safe procedure, with a minimum of complications related to hollow viscera. Mandatory education and accreditation of physicians dealing with bariatric endoscopy and strict supervision of the obese individuals, while living with the balloon, will eliminate such complications.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stavrou, G., Tsaousi, G., & Kotzampassi, K. (2019). Life-threatening visceral complications after intragastric balloon insertion: Is the device, the patient or the doctor to blame? Endoscopy International Open, 07(02), E122–E129. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0809-4994

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

57%

Researcher 4

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

73%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Decision Sciences 1

7%

Neuroscience 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free