Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: A sensemaking approach

139Citations
Citations of this article
474Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While bibliometric analysis is inherently quantitative and objective, it necessitates interpretation, thereby introducing an element of subjectivity. This article proposes a sensemaking approach that transitions researchers from mere description to proactive interpretation of bibliometric results, transforming raw information into informed insights. We discuss the applicability of sensemaking in bibliometric analysis and offer practical guidelines for its integration into systematic literature reviews. These guidelines revolve around a three-stage sensemaking process—that is, scanning, sensing, and substantiating—each crucial to deriving meaningful interpretations. As such, this article serves as a valuable guide for researchers seeking to utilize bibliometric analysis as a potent analytical tool in their review studies.

References Powered by Scopus

How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines

5621Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organizing and the process of sensemaking

4729Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries

2962Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on education: A web mining and machine learning approach

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lim, W. M., & Kumar, S. (2024). Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: A sensemaking approach. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(2), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22229

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 105

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 52

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 30

14%

Researcher 22

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 94

59%

Social Sciences 25

16%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22

14%

Computer Science 17

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free