A comparison of chlormethiazole and diazepam as intravenous sedatives for fibre-endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Summary: Chlormethiazole and diazepam as intravenous sedatives were compared in 75 patients undergoing fibre-endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Diazepam was considered to offer greater reliability and ease of administration. Chlormethiazole was found to be a safe drug and did not encourage salivation. Local pain caused by chlormethiazole injection can be abolished by the use of lignocaine. Chlormethiazole may be useful in patients who are hypotensive and who require emergency endoscopy. © 1975 Macmillan Journals Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Galizia, E. J., Metreweli, C., & Prout, B. J. (1975). A comparison of chlormethiazole and diazepam as intravenous sedatives for fibre-endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 47(3), 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/47.3.402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free