Implications Of The Homomorphism Definition Of Measurement On Accounting Measurement Theory

  • Musvoto S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study compares the principles of the representational theory of measurement with accounting practices to decipher the reasons creating a gap between accounting measurement practices and the scientific practices of measurement. Representational measurement establishes measurement in social scientific disciplines such as accounting. The discussion in this study focuses on the need for accounting to provide principled arguments to justify its status as a measurement discipline. The arguments made highlight the need for possible modifications of the accounting measurement concept to deal with issues that are at least partially philosophical in nature, such as the concept of error and the passing of value representations from finite to continuum. These problems are primarily conceptual in nature. They indicate that accounting is far from a measurement discipline. Their resolution could require major changes to the accounting concept of measurement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Musvoto, S. W. (2011). Implications Of The Homomorphism Definition Of Measurement On Accounting Measurement Theory. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 10(5), 23. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v10i5.4228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free