Regional Integration, Monetary Cooperation: Evidence from Global VAR Models for the Member States of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using quarterly data over the 1996 Q1 to 2015 Q5 period and a global vector regression (GVAR) model, this article empirically investigates the effect of supply, demand, and external shocks on member countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in order to examine if these countries have the ground to form a monetary union. The results suggest asymmetric response of central banks in these countries to domestic and external shocks and differentials in the impulse response of the macroeconomic variables to shocks: the response of the central banks of Kyrgyzstan and Russia to domestic shocks and of Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia to external shocks are short term and severe. Based on our results, forming a monitory union may not be feasible.

References Powered by Scopus

One money, one market: The effect of common currencies on trade

1021Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling Regional Interdependences Using a Global Error-Correcting Macroeconometric Model

759Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring the international linkages of the euro area: A global var analysis

475Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The results of the 20-year economic cooperation of the Shanghai cooperation organization and its development prospects

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating BRICS as an optimum currency area: insights from SVAR modeling

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khezri, M., Zulkhibri, M., & Ghazal, R. (2019). Regional Integration, Monetary Cooperation: Evidence from Global VAR Models for the Member States of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 11(1–2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910119874634

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 16

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0