L2F/INESC-ID at SemEval-2017 Tasks 1 and 2: Lexical and semantic features in word and textual similarity

4Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes our approach to the SemEval-2017 “Semantic Textual Similarity” and “Multilingual Word Similarity” tasks. In the former, we test our approach in both English and Spanish, and use a linguistically-rich set of features. These move from lexical to semantic features. In particular, we try to take advantage of the recent Abstract Meaning Representation and SMATCH measure. Although without state of the art results, we introduce semantic structures in textual similarity and analyze their impact. Regarding word similarity, we target the English language and combine WordNet information with Word Embeddings. Without matching the best systems, our approach proved to be simple and effective.

References Powered by Scopus

WordNet: A Lexical Database for English

11757Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-Term memory networks

1654Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A discriminative graph-based parser for the abstract meaning representation

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Measuring semantic similarity between words based on multiple relational information

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A fuzzy logic based synonym resolution approach for automated information retrieval

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Method for Perception and Assessment of Semantic Textual Similarities in English

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fialho, P., Rodrigues, H., Coheur, L., & Quaresma, P. (2017). L2F/INESC-ID at SemEval-2017 Tasks 1 and 2: Lexical and semantic features in word and textual similarity. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 213–219). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s17-2032

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

74%

Researcher 5

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 25

71%

Linguistics 5

14%

Engineering 3

9%

Neuroscience 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0