Professionalism in health care

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter will explore professionalism historically, from the work of Gregory and Percival in the eighteenth century to contemporary “new professionalism.” The chapter will identify how the core traditional values of professionalism, in particular commitments to an other-regarding social ethic and to maintaining high levels of scientifically informed expertise, alongside the defense of professional self-regulation, have been articulated and challenged. Classic accounts of professionalism are found in the work of Durkheim, Tawney, and Parsons. Critics have argued professionalism is in practice self-serving, particularly insofar as a professional ethic has justified the autonomous self-regulation of the profession. Over the last 30 years, responses to the perceived crisis of professionalism – due to the loss of broad public trust in the professions, changes in the nature of professional expertise, and increased demands for external regulation – have precipitated a series of more or less radical responses. New professionalism has now begun to question the desirability of professional autonomy and self-regulation and to articulate a professionalism committed to public engagement and the acceptance of external regulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edgar, A. (2017). Professionalism in health care. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine (pp. 677–697). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free