Reasonable Scepticism in the French Enlightenment: Some Connections Between Jean-Baptiste Boyer d’Argens, Louis de Beausobre, and Voltaire

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter underlines the specificities of “reasonable scepticism” as advocated during the French Enlightenment by Boyer d’Argens (La philosophie du bon sens, 1736), Beausobre (Le pyrrhonisme raisonnable, 1755), and Voltaire (Le philosophe ignorant, 1767). Despite notable differences, those three thinkers inspired each other, shaping an influential discourse. Their sober use of doubt appears to be characterized by a modest and often probabilistic epistemology (against rationalist systems), by a complete rejection of metaphysical certainty (against Christian apologetics but also against atheism), and by their ambivalence towards the rise of new science (with complex relationships to empiricism and contemporary scientific discoveries).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Correard, N. (2013). Reasonable Scepticism in the French Enlightenment: Some Connections Between Jean-Baptiste Boyer d’Argens, Louis de Beausobre, and Voltaire. In International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idees (Vol. 210, pp. 173–188). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free