Comparison of prognostic scores and surgical approaches to treat spinal metastatic tumors: A review of 57 cases

12Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Surgical treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression with or without neural deficit is controversial. Karnofsky and Tokuhashi scores have been proposed for prognosis of spinal metastasis. Here, we conducted a retrospective analysis of Karnofsky and modified Tokuhashi scores in 57 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for secondary spinal metastases to evaluate the value of these scores in aiding decision making for surgery. Comparison of preoperative Karnofsky and modified Tokuhashi scores with the type of the surgical approach for each patient revealed that both scores not only reliably estimate life expectancy, but also objectively improved surgical decisions. When the general status of the patient is poor (i.e., Karnofsky score less than 40% or modified Tokuhashi score of 5 or greater), palliative treatments and radiotherapy, rather than surgery, should be considered. © 2008 Yilmazlar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yilmazlar, S., Dogan, S., Caner, B., Turkkan, A., Bekar, A., & Korfali, E. (2008). Comparison of prognostic scores and surgical approaches to treat spinal metastatic tumors: A review of 57 cases. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-3-37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free