Mixed Methods in Venture Capital Research: An Illustrative Study and Directions for Future Work

14Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Professor Wright's body of research on venture capital (VC) has advanced the field and facilitated recent research on new sources of financing for start-ups, such as crowdfunding and blockchain. In this paper, inspired by Professor Wright's pursuit of encouraging new directions in research, we first demonstrate – with an illustrative study on VC learning – that mixed methods research, which combines quantitative and qualitative data, can be helpful in VC research. We also present some possible mixed methods directions for future research. We conclude with a short and critical discussion on both methods and research practices. In doing so, we hope to stimulate scholars’ interest in these underutilized methods.

References Powered by Scopus

The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage

8256Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come

4958Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills

3089Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Blockchain in banking and finance: A bibliometric review

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping the venture capital and private equity research: a bibliometric review and future research agenda

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Frequency connectedness between FinTech, NFT and DeFi: Considering linkages to investor sentiment

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levasseur, L., Johan, S., & Eckhardt, J. (2022). Mixed Methods in Venture Capital Research: An Illustrative Study and Directions for Future Work. British Journal of Management, 33(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12514

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

64%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

11%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 19

73%

Social Sciences 3

12%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

12%

Philosophy 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free