La evaluación axiológica de los Proyectos en los Comités de Ética de la investigación

  • Palma-Morgado D
  • Marín-Gil R
  • González-García L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that the existence of Ethics Research Committees is consistent with the historical time in which we reside. The idea of a neutral science dates back to the creation of the Royal Society. Putnam and other researchers proposed the term "epistemic values" to the values of science. This axiological transformation has been called in several ways: knowledge mode 2, post-normal science, post-academic science and technoscience. There is no innovation without evaluation, even without multiple previous assessments. The actual existence of the Research Ethics Committees (RECs) is a fact consistent with the historical development of epistemology in the twentieth century. One of the most important functions of RECs, is the axiological evaluation (epistemic values) of research projects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palma-Morgado, D., Marín-Gil, R., González-García, L., Torelló-Iserte, J., Santos-Lozano, J. M., & Ortega-Calvo, M. (2015). La evaluación axiológica de los Proyectos en los Comités de Ética de la investigación. Ars Pharmaceutica (Internet), 56(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.4321/s2340-98942015000200007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free