Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions

  • Walton D
  • Reed C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Argumentation schemes are forms of argument that model stereotypical patterns of reasoning. This paper is part of a project on the formalization of argumentation schemes. The paper shows how argumentation schemes and critical questions should be fitted into the technique of argument diagramming using the Araucaria software system. This XML-based system provides an interface through which the user can mark up a text of discourse to produce an argument diagram. We discuss several problems arising from the need to deal with enthymemes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walton, D., & Reed, C. (2003). Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions (pp. 195–211). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free