Interact and Higher Proficiency Students: Addressing the Challenges

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The findings of Stage 1 of the two-stage study indicated several challenges for interact going forward. Three are noted as of particular importance: the type and nature of the task; understanding ‘spontaneous and unrehearsed’; and (as an adjunct) a de-emphasis on grammatical accuracy as a key criterion for success. Stage II investigated NCEA level 3, the highest level of examination targeted at CEFR levels B1 and B2. At these ‘independent’ levels the new assessment is designed to capture students’ ability to enter unprepared into conversation (B1) and interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity (B2). NCEA level 3 therefore becomes an interesting test case of how interact in theory might be operationalised in practice. This chapter presents findings from the interviews with teachers (n = 13) who were using, or who had been involved with the development of, interact at NCEA level 3, with particular reference to the three identified challenges.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

East, M. (2016). Interact and Higher Proficiency Students: Addressing the Challenges. In Educational Linguistics (Vol. 26, pp. 147–166). Springer Science+Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0303-5_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free