Estimating bird and bat fatality at wind farms: A practical overview of estimators, their assumptions and limitations

42Citations
Citations of this article
183Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Over the last few years, great efforts have been made to improve the methodologies used to assess bird and bat fatalities at wind farms. For that purpose, several mortality estimators have been proposed. In general, these estimators account for: 1) partial coverage; 2) carcass removal (e.g. by scavengers or decay); and 3) imperfect detection. Perhaps surprisingly, a universal estimator that ensures good quality estimates under general circumstances is still lacking. Further, the existing estimators include different adjustment approaches and a variety of often implicit and misunderstood assumptions that may not be valid, making it difficult for practitioners to choose between them. Focusing on bird and bat fatality at onshore wind farms, we summarise and discuss implementation aspects and the assumptions involved in seven commonly used estimators. This should provide researchers requiring these methods with a basis to choose the most appropriate estimator under a given set of conditions, and contribute to increased standards in wind farm wildlife fatality estimation. © 2013 Bio3 - Estudos e Projectos em Biologia e Valorização de Recursos Naturais, Lda.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernardino, J., Bispo, R., Costa, H., & Mascarenhas, M. (2013, March). Estimating bird and bat fatality at wind farms: A practical overview of estimators, their assumptions and limitations. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2012.758155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free