The problems with multi-species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide?

127Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The investigation of six vertebrate taxa (viz freshwater fish, frogs, tortoises and terrapins, snakes, birds, and various mammal orders) at a national scale reveals that hotspots of species richness, endemism and rarity are not coincident within taxa. In order to design a more representative reserve system to protect all vertebrate species, a complementarity algorithm was applied to all taxa, combined and separately. The combined analysis yielded more efficient results (66 reserves are required to represent all 1074 species at least once) than the separate analyses (97 reserves). Many of these representative reserves coincide with both hotspots and existing reserves, and over 85% of the hotspots of most taxa coincide with existing reserves; thus South Africa's vertebrate fauna could be more effectively protected with only moderate acquisition of new, well-sited reserves. -from Author

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lombard, A. T. (1995). The problems with multi-species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? South African Journal of Zoology, 30(3), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02541858.1995.11448382

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free