Referral criteria for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings: A comparison of protocols

2Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to describe and compare the performance of two screening protocols used for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings. Method: Secondary data analysis was done to determine the performance of two protocols implemented during a preschool hearing screening program using mobile health technology in South Africa. Pure-tone audiometry screening at 25 dB HL for 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz in each ear was used by both protocols. The fail criterion for the first protocol (2,147 children screened) constituted a no-response on one or more frequencies in either ear. The second protocol required two or more no-responses (5,782 children). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between outcomes and protocol, age, gender, and duration. Results: Fail rates for the one-frequency fail protocol was 8.7% (n = 186) and 4.3% (n = 250) for the two-frequency fail protocol. Children screened with the two-frequency fail protocol were 52.9% less likely to fail (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eksteen, S., Eikelboom, R. H., Launer, S., Kuper, H., & Swanepoel, D. W. (2021). Referral criteria for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings: A comparison of protocols. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(3), 868–876. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free